View Full Version : How old should our world be?
miccofl
7th December 2003, 21:55
Another obvious poll...
Furloaf
7th December 2003, 22:51
Voted
Trip
7th December 2003, 23:04
Voted.
Laser
8th December 2003, 01:38
I heard 5 billion increases resources. Maybe it's not true. I have no idea. But I think fewer mountains are better, especially if we get the Celts. We will want to be able to take advantage of our 2 move unit.
Grungy
8th December 2003, 21:23
older the map the more spread out everything is including resources. you dont get more.
Dauphin
8th December 2003, 21:33
By the power vested in me as a Citizen of Netatolia, and the constitution of democratic judgement I, Dauphin, by hereby declare that I have correctly and timely voted in this poll.
5 Billion should make the map more even meaning less modification is needed.
brian_the_bold
9th December 2003, 16:35
5 billion means you wont get a start, or at least odds are agaist a 12 mountain tile starti like the devercity of the 5 billion maps :)
miccofl
21st December 2003, 21:45
The world age for the 1st games will be 4 billion years, there was a tie between 4 and 5 billion and a coin toss decided the poll.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.