PDA

View Full Version : Another rules poll - Automation.


miccofl
26th April 2004, 21:39
What exclusions should there be, if any, to the restrictions on use of the Automation commands (including stack movement)?
No exclusions. Only worker tasks (roading, mining, irrigating, etc.) and stack/individual unit movement that concludes in the current turn can be automated.


Local exclusions only. Automation of worker tasks (roading, mining, irrigating, etc.) is permitted. Stack & individual unit movement that concludes within currently (when order is given, not when units arrive) defined national borders can be automated.


Line of Sight exclusions. Automation of worker tasks (roading, mining, irrigating, etc.) is permitted. Stack & individual unit movement that concludes within territory currently (when order is given, not when units arrive) visible (ie. not in the fog of war) is permitted.


Local exclusions with oversight. Automation of worker tasks (roading, mining, irrigating, etc.) is permitted. Stack & individual unit movement that concludes within currently (when order is given, not when units arrive) defined national borders can be automated. Automated moves are subject to administrator oversight. Contested moves that result in an unfair advantage (ie. reinforcing a poorly defended city or location, etc.) will remain a violation of this rule.


Line of Sight exclusions with oversight. Automation of worker tasks (roading, mining, irrigating, etc.) is permitted. Stack & individual unit movement that concludes within territory currently (when order is given, not when units arrive) visible (ie. not in the fog of war) is permitted. Automated moves are subject to administrator oversight. Contested moves that result in an unfair advantage (ie. reinforcing a poorly defended city or location, etc.) will remain a violation of this rule.

This is a 3 day poll and I have voted.


Edit: Just so you all know, GCA voted immediately to allow automation - figures. :rolleyes:

Dauphin
26th April 2004, 22:02
Voted 1. I think anything else is just opening yourself up to exploitations.

reismark
26th April 2004, 22:18
I likewise vote Option 1.

Dauphin
26th April 2004, 22:22
Talking of rules changes, I wondered if this was a known issue or worth mentioning?

http://www.civgaming.net/forums/showthread.php?t=4702

brian_the_bold
26th April 2004, 22:24
Voted

miccofl
26th April 2004, 22:48
Talking of rules changes, I wondered if this was a known issue or worth mentioning?

http://www.civgaming.net/forums/showthread.php?t=4702

Nope. But it was a good thought, see my reply.

Furloaf
26th April 2004, 23:10
Voted.

Sashaddin
28th April 2004, 04:25
Voted 1.

Laser
28th April 2004, 07:20
Yeah...option 1 is cool.

shadowlord3
28th April 2004, 12:44
voted

muk14
28th April 2004, 16:44
Ok I will just go with the flow & voted 1

Trip
29th April 2004, 00:04
Voted.